| Risk Factors | Weight | Risk Potential | Total | ||||||
| Scores | |||||||||
| Low | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | High | |||
| Business / Organisational | |||||||||
| Urgency of need to change | 12 | Little | * | Vital | 60 | ||||
| Culture | 5 | Innovative, Lively | * | Closed,dead | 10 | ||||
| Climate / Politics | 6 | Open / Friendly | * | Conflict/Bad feeling | 12 | ||||
| Business Environment | 8 | Static | * | Rapid Change | 32 | ||||
| Competition | 8 | Low | * | High | 24 | ||||
| Growth / Stability | 6 | Slow /Stable | * | Rapid/Unstable | 18 | ||||
| Management Style | 10 | Inclusive | * | Dictatorial | 20 | ||||
| Management Experience | 8 | Highly Competent | * | Na�ve | 16 | ||||
| Responsibilities and Leadership | 5 | Clear | * | Unclear | 10 | ||||
| Perception of Problems | 5 | Shared | * | Disagreed | 10 | ||||
| Staff Characteristics | 5 | Willing and Able | * | Unmotive,inept | 10 | ||||
| Adoption of IT | 10 | Effective | * | Ineffective | 10 | ||||
| Quality Assurance Procedures | 5 | Well Established | * | Rough and ready | 10 | ||||
| Available Finance | 7 | High | * | Low | 14 | ||||
| Risk Factors | Weight | Risk Potential | Total | ||||||
| Scores | |||||||||
| Low | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | High | |||
| Technical Options | |||||||||
| Operational | 13 | Matches Objectives | * | Dosnt Match Objectives | 13 | ||||
| Financial | 12 | Within Budget | * | Over Budget Limit | 12 | ||||
| Economic Return | 15 | Good investment | * | Poor investment | 15 | ||||
| Social Upset | 5 | Improvement | * | Angry disruption | 10 | ||||
| Schedule | 10 | Easily on time | * | May be Late | 10 | ||||
| Amount of change caused | 7 | Highly Beneficial | * | Little Difference | 14 | ||||
| Potential User Impact | 8 | Low | * | High | 32 | ||||
| Ethical/Legal Problems | 7 | Few | * | Many | 28 | ||||
| Number of Suppliers | 4 | One | * | >5 | 20 | ||||
| Supplier Support | 5 | High, Reliable | * | Low,Unrelaible | 15 | ||||
| Security Risk | 9 | Low | * | High | 36 | ||||
| Newness of Technology | 5 | Tried and Tested | * | Frontier Breaking | 20 | ||||
| Risk Factors | Weight | Risk Potential | Total | ||||||
| Scores | |||||||||
| Low | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | High | |||
| Project | |||||||||
| Definition of Aims and Objectives | 7 | Clear | * | Unclear | 14 | ||||
| Room for improvement | 8 | Great | * | Little | 8 | ||||
| Project Plan | 5 | Detailed | * | Unprepared | 10 | ||||
| Feasibility | 5 | Certain | * | Uncertain | 5 | ||||
| Size | 2 | Small | * | Large | 4 | ||||
| Budget | 5 | <$10,000 | * | >$500,000 | 15 | ||||
| Development Timescale | 4 | < 3 Months | * | >2 years | 12 | ||||
| Operation/ Delivery Date | 4 | Flexible | * | Tight | 12 | ||||
| Quality / Standards | 4 | Minimal | * | Strict | 16 | ||||
| Monitoring and Control Mechanisms | 4 | Good | * | Does not exist | 12 | ||||
| Newness of project / Ambitiousness | 4 | Familiar | * | * | Strange | 12 | |||
| Complexity | 4 | Easy | * | Difficult | 8 | ||||
| Resource Availability | 4 | Very Good | * | Inadequate | 6 | ||||
| Project Team's Experience | 5 | Expert | * | Inexperienced | 25 | ||||
| Skills Required | 1 | Few | * | Many | 1 | ||||
| Number of Owners | 3 | One | * | Many | 12 | ||||
| No. of Staff / Groups involved | 3 | Few | * | Many | 9 | ||||
| No. of interfaces to other systems | 3 | One | * | >10 | 6 | ||||
| Legacy equipment integration | 5 | None | * | Many | 20 | ||||
| Need for Security | 4 | Low | * | High | 8 | ||||
| Management Commitment | 4 | Strong | * | Weak | 16 | ||||
| User Demand | 6 | Keen | * | Hostile | 6 | ||||
| User Involvement | 4 | High throughout | * | Minimal | 4 | ||||
| Staff Capability | 4 | High,adaptable | * | Low,untrained | 8 | ||||
1) Risks to be avoided
Business organisational- urgency of need to change, business environment, competition
Technical Options- Potential user impact, ethical problems, security risk
Project- Budget, project team experience, legacy equipment integration
2) Risk to monitored
Business Organisational - growth stability, management style, management experience
Technical Option- Amount of change, Number of suppliers
Project- Management commitments, Number of owners, Quality standard
3) Risks that should be provided in a Risk Management Plan
Business/Organisational- Urgency of need to change, business environment, competition
Project: Budget, Development timescale, Operation delivery date
Technical Options: Financial, potential user impact, security risk